Planetary Ruin

Bob Murray the CEO of Murray Energy Corp gave a news conference to update the people of America on the status of the miners who are currently unaccounted for after a mine collapse in Utah.  After listening to the conference for a few minutes it seemed obvious that Mr Murray was more interested in attacking, Al Gore, the new global warming act passed earlier in the week and making a point about how his business was hampered rather than to actually show compassion to the miners and their families.  Now I must admit that I didn’t hear the whole speech but the parts I did hear left me wondering what kind of person Bob Murray is and what kind of company Murray Energy Corporation is.  Murray spoke at great length about the problems that the average American citizen was going to face of the new global warming act, he also regaled us about how much the American economy was going to suffer and how the USA would no longer be competitive on the world markets.  He suggested the average citizen of the US would pay more than 4 times more for electricity and he invited people to come to his mine, once the tragedy was over to see the high tech and essential jobs and services the mine offered.

Then Mr. Murray reported on how the families were doing, saying that they were “fine considering circumstances”.  He then stated that this was a tragedy for the families, America and for himself personally.

He went on to say that the Murray Energy Corp was telling people of America the truth, that they have always been truthful and they have been keeping the families informed.
With less then 30 seconds said about the workers and their families, Mr. Murray started a tirade about how it was the mines first accident in 20 years…
I tuned out at that point.  In my opinion here was a very wealthy man, worrying more about his career, the impact of the energy bill on his business and little to no concern about the families and the men involved in the accident.

Watch the video for yourself… and tell me if this man of money actually cared for the people involved in the mining accident, or if he decided to use this tragic event to try and sway public opinion.  I say keep you mouth shut about politics, and other outside factors until the accident has been resolved.  Do not stand there while lives hang in the balance and complain about how unfair things are for you…. because we just don’t care!

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2pitz_heat-talk_news

 

The world experienced a series of record-breaking weather events in early 2007, from flooding in Asia to heatwaves in Europe and snowfall in South Africa, the United Nations weather agency said on Tuesday.

The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) said global land surface temperatures in January and April were likely the warmest since records began in 1880, at more than 1 degree Celsius higher than average for those months.

There have also been severe monsoon floods across South Asia, abnormally heavy rains in northern Europe, China, Sudan, Mozambique and Uruguay, extreme heatwaves in southeastern Europe and Russia, and unusual snowfall in South Africa and South America this year, the WMO said.

“The start of the year 2007 was a very active period in terms of extreme weather events,” Omar Baddour of the agency’s World Climate Program told journalists in Geneva.

While most scientists believe extreme weather events will be more frequent as heat-trapping carbon dioxide emissions cause global temperatures to rise, Baddour said it was impossible to say with certainty what the second half of 2007 will bring.

“It is very difficult to make projections for the rest of the year,” he said.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a U.N. umbrella group of hundreds of experts, has noted an increasing trend in extreme weather events over the past 50 years and said irregular patterns are likely to intensify.

South Asia’s worst monsoon flooding in recent memory has affected 30 million people in India, Bangladesh and Nepal, destroying croplands, livestock and property and raising fears of a health crisis in the densely-populated region.

Heavy rains also doused southern China in June, with nearly 14 million people affected by floods and landslides that killed 120 people, the WMO said.

England and Wales this year had their wettest May and June since records began in 1766, resulting in extensive flooding and more than $6 billion in damage, as well as at least nine deaths. Germany swung from its driest April since country-wide observations started in 1901 to its wettest May on record.

Read more >>

Dangerous heat will blanket most of the eastern half of the nation today, while drenching storms develop along the rim of the heat from the central Plains to the Great Lakes.

A large dome of high pressure over the Gulf Coast states is pumping hot air into most areas east of the Rockies. The Severe Weather Center lists the widespread heat-related Warnings and Advisories in effect through much of this week.

 Temperatures today will soar into the mid- to upper 90s across the southern Plains, the Ohio Valley and the Southeast. Some centers top the century mark and challenge record highs.

According to the East Regional News story, 90-degree heat will spread through the mid-Atlantic and parts of southern New England. Increased humidity will create dangerous RealFeel® temperatures near or above 100 degrees along the Interstate 95 corridor as far north as Massachusetts.

Residents should use extreme care during this heat wave to avoid suffering from heat-related illnesses.

Be sure to drink lots of water, wear loose and light-colored clothing, avoid strenuous activity and stay in air conditioned buildings. Children and pets should never be left in cars, even for a few minutes. The elderly, small children and chronically ill are especially vulnerable to the heat.

While the heat in the Northeast will ease slightly later in the week, there will be little or no relief from the sizzling temperatures in other regions.

The Southwest Regional News story reports the heat across the southern Plains during the upcoming days will be noteworthy. Today, the forecast high of 95 degrees in San Antonio, Tex., will be the first 95-degree day this year. By this date last year, the city had recorded more than 65 days of 95 degrees or higher.

Conditions could be brutal for the final major of the 2007 men’s professional golf season. The 89th PGA Championship begins Thursday at the Southern Hills Country Club in Tulsa, Okla. High temperatures near or above 100 degrees will bake the fairways and greens, while excessive humidity will produce unbearable conditions for the players and fans alike.

Read more >>

A Senate bill to cut U.S. greenhouse gas emissions would raise energy prices and also reduce American economic output by more than half a trillion dollars over two decades, according to a government report released on Monday.

Congress is expected to consider climate legislation this fall that would fight global warming. Many businesses worry the U.S. economy would suffer under a measure to impose tough mandatory cuts in emissions.

One proposal, introduced by Sens. Joseph Lieberman and John McCain, would gradually reduce total U.S. emissions by the year 2050 to 60 percent below 1990 levels.

The bill would require companies to report their yearly greenhouse gas emissions and submit a matching number of government-issued allowances to equal the emissions spewed. Companies that emit more would have to buy allowances from cleaner companies that produce fewer emissions.

However, the proposal would cut into the U.S. economy and raise gasoline and other energy prices paid by consumers, according to an analysis of the legislation by the Energy Information Administration.

The legislation “increases the cost of using energy, which reduces real economic output, reduces purchasing power, and lowers aggregate demand for goods and services,” the EIA said.

With companies trying to meet the shrinking emissions levels, U.S. economic output would be $533 billion lower over the 2009 to 2030 time period, the agency said.

In the transportation sector, gasoline and other petroleum products would cost more as oil refiners buy allowances to cover the emissions spewed by their facilities.

“The cost of the allowances will be included in the prices of the fuels,” the EIA said.

Gasoline prices are forecast to be 23 cents a gallon higher in 2020 and 41 cents more in 2030 because of the required emission cuts, the agency said.

The EIA said the fuel price increases would not be large enough “to create dramatic shifts in consumer behavior,” but there would be more demand for fuel efficient vehicles.

Read more >>

In April, 1975, in an issue mostly taken up with stories about the collapse of the American-backed government of South Vietnam, NEWSWEEK published a small back-page article about a very different kind of disaster. Citing “ominous signs that the earth’s weather patterns have begun to change dramatically,” the magazine warned of an impending “drastic decline in food production.” Political disruptions stemming from food shortages could affect “just about every nation on earth.” Scientists urged governments to consider emergency action to head off the terrible threat of . . . well, if you had been following the climate-change debates at the time, you’d have known that the threat was: global cooling.

More than 30 years later, that little story is still being quoted regularly—as recently as last month on the floor of the Senate by Republican Sen. James Inhofe, chair of the Environment and Public Works Committee and the self-proclaimed scourge of climate alarmists. The article’s appeal to Inhofe, of course, is not its prescience, but the fact that it was so spectacularly wrong about the near-term future. Even by the time it appeared, a decades-long trend toward slightly cooler temperatures in the Northern hemisphere had already begun to reverse itself—although that wouldn’t be apparent in the data for a few years yet—leading to today’s widespread consensus among scientists that the real threat is actually human-caused global warming. In fact, as Inhofe pointed out, for more than 100 years journalists have quoted scientists predicting the destruction of civilization by, in alternation, either runaway heat or a new Ice Age. The implication he draws is that if you’re not worried about being trampled by a stampede of woolly mammoths through downtown Chicago, you don’t have to believe what the media is saying about global warming, either.

But is that the right lesson to draw?  How did NEWSWEEK—or for that matter, Time magazine, which also ran a story on the subject in the mid-1970s—get things so wrong? In fact, the story wasn’t “wrong” in the journalistic sense of “inaccurate.” Some scientists indeed thought the Earth might be cooling in the 1970s, and some laymen—even one as sophisticated and well-educated as Isaac Asimov—saw potentially dire implications for climate and food production. After all, Ice Ages were common in Earth’s history; if anything, the warm “interglacial” period in which human civilization evolved, and still exists, is the exception. The cause of these periodic climatic shifts is still being studied and debated, but many scientists believe they are influenced by small changes in the Earth’s orbit around the Sun (including its “eccentricity,” or the extent to which it deviates from a perfect circle) and the tilt of its rotation. As calculated by the mathematician Milutin Milankovitch in the 1920s, these factors vary on interlocking cycles of around 20,000, 40,000 and 100,000 years, and if nothing else changed they would be certain to bring on a new Ice Age at some time. In the 1970s, there were scientists who thought this shift might be imminent; more recent data, according to William Connolley, a climate scientist at the British Antarctic Survey who has made a hobby of studying Ice Age predictions, suggest that it might be much farther off.

Read more >>